Here’s the headline:
KS legislature would allow school employees to carry guns
Insert heavy sigh….
Let’s play the fact game shall we?
Fact by the a study out of the University of Pennsylvania studying 677 shootings over 2.5 years:
People carrying guns were 4.5 times more likely to be shot.
4.2 times more likely to be killed.
The conclusion was there a hyper-confidence when it came to people carrying guns that people who were not armed didn’t have. They were more likely to put themselves in dangerous positions on purpose, increasing the likelihood to be shot.
It is more likely that my kid will be killed by lightning than shot by a mass shooter.
I know, this doesn’t work when it comes to the NRA lobby wanting everyone to have a gun.
According to the National Weather Service – 54 people are killed by lightning strikes each year.
Mass shootings by year and number of people from Alan Fox, Northwestern University Lipman Family Professor of Curriculum Law and Public Policy:
2009 – 27
2008 – 29
2007 – 23
From the American Academy of Pediatrics:
This statement reaffirms the 1992 position of the American Academy of Pediatrics that the absence of guns from children’s homes and communities is the most reliable and effective measure to prevent firearm-related injuries in children and adolescents.
Some more interesting stats: In 1997, 306 (7.2%) children and adolescents younger than 20 years killed by firearms died as a result of unintentional firearm-related injuries.
Let’s just ignore those silly docs and all those facts showing that kids are more likely to die from accidental shootings from guns and do the opposite by adding MORE guns to places that our kids frequent – schools. Makes perfect sense (more sarcasm).
From that liberal and non-credible institution called Harvard:
To begin with, having a gun in the home is a risk factor for serious accidental injury and death. As Hemenway points out, death certificate data indicate that 680 Americans were killed accidentally with guns each year between 2003 and 2007. Half those victims were under the age of 25.
I’m sure that having guns in schools will in no way increase the possibility that my child will die from an accidental death from a firearm vs. a mass shooting. (sarcasm)
Now I can already feel pro-gun lobbyist typing out their response to me – “but it’s a deterrent to ward off would be gunmen.”
I’ve noticed how we don’t have any first degree murder now that we have the death penalty. Deterrents work so well. Also, since we have all decided that mass gunmen suffer from extreme forms of mental illness, I’m sure they are in their right mind enough to conclude deterrents when they are figure out where their next mass shooting should be.
Adding guns to schools by arming school employees actually increases the likelihood that my child will die from a shooting-an accidental shooting from school employees.
More guns equal more chances my child will get shot. Hey – I’m pretty good with math. I credit great, unarmed teachers! I understand that we all want to keep kids safe. That is a great goal, but arming school employees isn’t the answer. We need to keep our eye on the statistics and not over-react. Just say no to this legislation!